Kevin’s posterous

Thanks for trying some of my creative juice 

Scientific Web Design: 23 Actionable Lessons from Eye-Tracking Studies

Eye-tracking studies are hot in the web design world, but it can be hard to figure out how to translate the results of these studies into real design implementations. These are a few tips from eye-tracking studies that you can use to improve the design of your webpage.

  1. Text attracts attention before graphics. Contrary to what you might think, the first thing users look at on a website isn’t the images. Most casual users will be coming to your site looking for information, not images, so make sure your website is designed so that the most important parts of your text are what is most prominent.
  2. Initial eye movement focuses on the upper left corner of the page. It shouldn’t be surprising that users look at webpages in this way, as most computer applications are designed with the top left hand side as the main focus. You can do your website a favor by keeping this format in mind when creating a design. Remember, while you want to have a personal style, you have to keep the habits of your readers in mind if you want your site to be successful.
  3. Users initially look at the top left and upper portion of the page before moving down and to the right. Users were found to generally scan webpages in the shape of an ‘F’. Make sure the important elements of your content are located in these key areas to keep readers engaged. Place headlines, subheadlines, bullet points, and highlighted text along these lines so readers will be enticed to read further.
  4. Readers ignore banners. Ads may be the bread and butter of your site, but studies have shown that readers largely ignore banner ads, often focusing for only a fraction of a second. If you’re trying to make money from ads, you need to be creative in your ad placement or in the types of ads you have on your site.
Click here to read the other 19 tips

Source: Virtual Hosting Blog

Comments [0]

American Leisure: Reading & TV Down. Computer Use Up

Americans' favorite leisure activities are reading, TV-watching and spending time with friends and family - the same top three as in 2004, but with lower percentage of people citing them, according to a Harris Poll, writes MarketingCharts.

Also according to the results of the survey:

  • Over one-third (35 percent) cited reading in 2004, but this year that is down to 29 percent.
  • TV watching has dropped from 21 percent to 18 percent.
  • Spending time with friends and family has dropped from 20 percent to 14 percent.
  • Computer activities has risen from 7 percent to 9 percent.
  • Going to the movies has dropped from 10 percent to 7 percent.

Biggest Changes

The largest increases in popularity in the past 12 years - since 1995, when this survey was first conducted - are the following:

  • Computer activities (not surprisingly) - up seven points, from 2 percent to 9 percent.
  • Watching sporting events (up four points)
  • Exercise (up three points)
  • Crafts (up three points)

The biggest declines in popularity over the last 12 years are in TV-watching (down seven points), sewing/crocheting (down five points), entertaining (down four points) and swimming (down four points).

Hours Working and Available for Leisure

The number of hours spent working (including housekeeping and studying) dropped from a median of 50 hours in 2004 to a median of 45 hours this year - the lowest since 1975, when it was at 43 hours.

The number of hours available for leisure per week has not changed much since 2004. It is now 20 hours; in 2004 it was 19 hours.

About the survey: The Harris Poll was conducted by telephone within the United States between October 16 and 23 among 1,052 adults (age 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region, number of adults in the household, size of place (urbanicity) and number of phone lines in the household were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population.

Source: MarketingVox

Comments [0]

Negative product reviews aren't so bad

Worried about opening your company to consumer reviews? Don't be. Bazaarvoice's VP explains why bad reviews are good for your business.

When retailers and marketers talk about social media, one question comes up a lot: what about negative reviews?

According to Shop.org and MarketingSherpa studies, less than 26 percent of retailers have customer ratings and reviews, yet 96 percent of the retailers that do have reviews find it to be an effective or highly effective feature. So what is stopping other retailers from adopting this feature?

In addition to technology and headcount obstacles, fear of negative reviews is one of the biggest hurdles that retailers -- most particularly, retail executives -- must overcome in order to embrace ratings and reviews. Yet through many clients and evidence we've found negative reviews not only to be necessary, but also valuable.

In a recent study focused on product reviews, Patti Freeman Evans, a Jupiter Analyst suggests, "Retailers must take the good with the bad when it comes to user-generated content. But, because consumers are most likely to report on positive experiences, retailers need not be afraid of the other old adage, "Be careful what you wish for." Consumers expect to see both good and bad reviews. The good reviews validate seller product information; the bad provide the caveat emptor that retailers cannot provide themselves."

1. Customers are looking for negative reviews
According to an eVoc Insights study, 48 percent of consumers need to consult reviews before making an online purchase. What are they looking for?

I often ask friends and people I meet how they use reviews. Almost everyone describes looking for the negative comments to make sure they can live with any shortcomings in products they buy. We all know we don't live in a world of five-star products, and customers are desperate to know product blemishes before they make a purchase.

Lawrence Kerstan, CEO of Despair (those funny demotivational posters) recently bought a Lexus GS300 and researched it heavily online. What's the first thing he sought in his online research? Negative reviews. He had this car in mind, and the negative comments about the car were nit picks and factors that really didn't bother him. He had the information he needed to make the purchase.

If 48 percent of customers need to read reviews before making a purchase, they are looking for what could be wrong with a product. If they can't find it on your site, they're going to find it elsewhere.

"As for the product(s) with negative reviews -- my experience is that negative reviews do not hurt a product as long as there are also positive reviews associated with it." says Don Zeidler, Director of Direct Marketing for W. Atlee Burpee Co. "I'd guess that when customers see a mix of different ratings they are more apt to trust the review process. Secondly, we all know as marketers (or should know) customers who are interested in a particular product are only looking for affirmation or reassurance that the product is right for them; it's one they need to have. Negative reviews help customers affirm they've vetted all concerns before making a purchase decision. As long as the reviews are not entirely and overwhelmingly negative -- just nit picks that people decide they can live with (they usually are) -- these negative reviews help customers pass through purchase paralysis."

2. Negative reviews establish authenticity
Do you believe all of your products deserve five stars? You, like all consumers, know we don't live in a five star world. Customers know that if there aren't dissenting opinions about a product, then the opinions aren't real. If all they see are five-star reviews, they're reading testimonials, not authentic, credible customer reviews to help make a purchase decision.

For example, what's one of the best selling products so far this decade? The Apple iPod. It gets a ton of positive reviews, but one negative comment you'll see over and over again is that the surface of the iPod scratches easily. Customers say things that the retailer and Apple can't say: "When you buy this, get a case". Obviously this is not stopping customers from buying the iPod, but this constructive advice is getting them to buy a case. (iPod Accessories is a one billion dollar business!).

3. Negative reviews help the retailer's business
Negative reviews not only help customers make purchase decisions, they also help the retailer in several ways.

For example, negative reviews help improve customer satisfaction and lower returns. Consider a personal example. Amazon.com used to sell a toy called "Hot Wheels Slimecano". You can't find it through search, but you can find it here. The last time I looked, it had 177 reviews, almost all negative (1.5 star average rating). Several years ago, my wife purchased this toy from Hell for our son for Christmas. After an hour of frustrating attempts by my father and me to assemble this disaster, I was motivated enough to mash it back in the box, return it to the retailer and write a review on Amazon to warn others. When I got to the product details page, there were already over 100 negative reviews, one of them titled, "If you want your child to cry, buy this toy." I considered the title, "If you want your husband to cry, buy this toy!"

I wondered why Amazon was still selling this toy after such overwhelming negative response. How many dissatisfied, frustrated parents bought this toy, and how many returns did Amazon and other retailers suffer? Certainly the negative reviews helped reduced the sales and returns. But more importantly, if the retailer's mission is to be a trusted editor of its assortment, then products with overwhelmingly negative reviews should help prune this assortment quickly for the best products. After about a year and a half on the shelves, Amazon no longer sells the Slimecano.

If you are selling a bad product you have three choices:

  1. Without reviews, you keep selling the product and risk costly returns and low customer satisfaction
  2. With reviews, you can use the leading indicator of negative reviews and quickly remove this product from inventory to reduce returns and improve satisfaction
  3. Or, just allow the negative reviews to steer customers to a more satisfying purchase within the category. Let the best products win, and you will win.

In cases 2 and 3 you remain a trusted editor of the best products; customers are happy; you maintain their loyalty, and avoid a return.

Patti Freeman, in her analysis suggests, "Online shoppers who find reviews valuable are much more likely to say that they are less likely to return products that they've bought based on customer reviews they read online. This sentiment offers double benefit of lower return costs for the retailer and a corresponding bump in satisfaction because buyers get the item that fits their need."

4. There aren't many negative reviews
After the above three reasons, you might agree that negative reviews are a good thing. But if management is still concerned, here's the nuclear argument: positive reviews outweigh negative reviews seven to one.

Across all of Bazaarvoice clients, four and five-star reviews outnumber one and two-star ratings seven to one. Conventional wisdom suggests people talk more about negative experiences than positive ones. Perhaps this is the case for customer service experiences. For product word of mouth, however, the data refutes conventional wisdom.

A recent study by KellerFay group found nearly two-thirds (62 percent) of brand-related talk features products in a positive light, while less than one in 10 conversations feature products negatively.

And according to a recent Jupiter study on ratings and reviews, 60 percent of online shoppers provide feedback about shopping experiences, and they are more likely to give feedback about a positive experience than a negative one.

So there you have it. You probably anticipate far more negative reviews than you get. For those you do get, they are a gift from the Gods of authenticity and credibility, which can help your business more than harm it.

Sam Decker is vice president of marketing and products for Bazaarvoice, Inc. Read full bio.

Source: iMediaConnection

Comments [0]

Report: 4 in 10 plan to shop on Black Friday

More than 4 in 10 U.S. consumers (44 percent) say they plan to shop on the day after Thanksgiving - "Black Friday" - and more than half say they rely on advertising and word-of-mouth for information on products, according to the findings of an Accenture survey, reports MarketingCharts.

Among the key findings of the Accenture Holiday Retail Survey 2007:

  • Nearly two-thirds (62 percent) cite advertising as their primary source to learn about holiday products. More than half (55 percent) cite word of mouth. Fewer consumers consult retailer and manufacturer websites (39 percent and 23 percent, respectively).

  • Nearly six in 10 respondents (57 percent) said they will set a budget for holiday gift buying before heading to the stores, but about half (51 percent) of respondents said they are likely to overspend their budget.

  • More than two-thirds (70 percent) of respondents are concerned about the safety of products made in China:
    • Almost half (48 percent) said they have chosen not to buy items manufactured in China, and 9 percent said they have returned an item made in China.
    • More than a third of respondents (37 percent) said they are unconcerned about where the goods they buy are made.
  • When asked what bothers them most about holiday shopping in stores, the greatest number of respondents - 77 percent - cited crowded malls, followed by long lines (65 percent).

  • About half of respondents (49 percent) said that gas prices will not affect their holiday spending, but nearly the same amount (45 percent) said they will make fewer shopping trips this year due to gas prices.

Findings regarding 'green' shopping:

  • Almost half of respondents (47 percent) said concern for the environment is an important influence on their shopping behavior, and nearly six in 10 (57 percent) said they are willing to spend more on "green" products.

  • More consumers seek environmentally friendly products than look for environmentally friendly retailers (60 percent versus 46 percent).
  • Some shoppers, however, are influenced by retailers' environmental practices, with 35 percent of respondents saying they are influenced by retailers' recycling programs.

MarketingCharts provides additional findings, including on shoppers' attitute toward 'hot' products and gift cards.

About the study: The web-based survey of 532 U.S. consumers age 18 and older was fielded in November 2007.

Source: MarketingVox

Comments [0]

PR is useless

...when actions tell the real story.


Karen Hughes spent $900 million of Americans' money to convince the Muslim world that our elected leaders in Washington aren't insane. Worldwide opinion polls say otherwise.

Walmart has probably spent close to the same amount of money trying to convince us it isn't the greediest company in the world. But its actions tell us the real story. Today, it's how Walmart is trying to avoid paying state taxes.

Comcast can say it's "comcastic" all it wants, but when its technicians fall asleep on customers' couches, or grandmothers with a heart condition get so frustrated by the company's inattention they smash up a local office, then no amount of professional PR can mask its dreadful operations.

Hundreds of smaller businesses pay PR firms to spam bloggers with meaningless press releases. That's because they don't know how to tell their own stories with actions, not words. They don't understand that real word of mouth, real PR, is generated at the root levels.

The root levels are the clerks, the sales people, the support staff, the receptionist, the call center people, the on-site technicians and consultants, or the police officers, the clerks at the government offices, or the nurses who take your temperature and blood at the hospital. It's their work that generates real PR.

The best PR comes from the smallest of actions by the root-level people. They smile when they first meet you. They call you by your name. They compliment competitors. They don't blame you for their system's misgivings. When forced to make a decision, they always, always, always do the right thing, even if it's not in the economic or political interests of their employer. They break the rules when it's obvious they must.

That's real PR. It's the total sum of stories people tell about you.

Source: Church of the Customer

Comments [0]

iCan't Type Well With My iPhone

Apple's iPhone is a breakthrough phone, no doubt. But its "soft" keyboard is causing "breaks" all of its own as iPhone users are forced to clean up typos caused by its unconventional keyboard.


That according to a new study from usability consulting firm User Centric. From the study:
The researchers found that although iPhone users entered text as fast as their counterparts, they made significantly more texting errors. IPhone users made 5.6 errors per message, while keyboard users made 2.1 mistakes per message and numeric phone typers made 2.4 mistakes.


That's a lot of typos, especially for a small business person who is trying to deliver a professional text or email message to a colleague or customer, rather than a teenager typing "lol" and "brb" to a friend.

Is it enough to turn users off the iPhone? Probably not, but the lack of a full, hard keypad is definitely one of the iPhone's shortcomings.

Source: SmartBiz.com

Comments [0]

Mobile IM growing

Mobile instant-messaging (IM) is growing among IM users, especially teens, according to the second annual AP-AOL Instant Messaging Trends Survey, which found 25 percent of respondents send IMs from cell phones, including one in three (32 percent) teens, reports

The proliferation of cell phones with QWERTY keyboards makes it easier to send mobile IMs; also, major instant messaging services let users have incoming IMs forwarded directly to cell phones.

Moreover, IM users instant-message from within their social-networking profiles, the survey found.

Instant messaging is popular not only at home and on-the-go but also at the workplace: More than one in four (27 percent) users say they use instant messaging at work, and half of at-work IM users say instant messaging makes them more productive at work — a 25 percent increase over last year.

The most popular IM service was AIM by AOL, cited by 54 percent of teens and adults surveyed; next was Yahoo's with 41 percent; and Windows Messenger with 35 percent.

MySpace IM was cited by 15 percent (23 percent of teens):

Among other top-line survey findings regarding users of instant messaging:

  • Nearly three in four teens (70 percent) and one in four adults (24 percent) send more instant messages than emails.
  • Multitasking remains very popular, as IM users tend to engage in multiple online activities while sending instant messages:
  • Checking email is the most popular activity among eight in ten adult and teen IM users.
  • After email, adult IM users most often conduct online searches (49 percent), while teens say they like to research homework assignments online (57 percent).
  • Nearly four in five (79 percent) at-work IM users say they have used instant messaging in the office to take care of personal matters; and 19 percent of IM users say they send more instant messages than emails to their co-workers and colleagues.

Findings about teens and IM use:

  • More than half (55 percent) of teen IM users have used instant messaging to get help with their homework - a 17 percent increase over last year.
  • 22 percent of teens say they have sent an IM to ask for or accept a date.
  • 43 percent of teen IM users say they have used instant messaging to say something they would not say to someone in person. Teenage girls are more likely than boys to do so: nearly half of teenage girls, compared with just over one-third of teenage boys.
  • Teens today are more likely to upload photos (42 percent in 2007 vs. 34 percent in 2006) while instant messaging. They are less likely to conduct online research for school (57 percent vs. 63 percent) or update their blog or social profile (33 percent vs. 42 percent) while sending IMs.

About the study: Interviewing for the AP-AOL Instant Messaging Trends Survey was conducted online by Knowledge Networks among a national sample of 1,246 instant messaging users, including 836 adults aged 19 and older and 410 teens age 13-18.

Source: MarketingVOX

Comments [0]

Gut feelings, nothing more than gut feelings

In the recent book Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer makes the case for intuition. Curiously, many assessments of the book took for granted that his arguments, familiar to readers of Malcolm Gladwell's Blink, cut against conventional wisdom--that trusting intuition is, in fact, counterintuitive. As one friendly interviewer, casting Gigerenzer as a contrarian, put it: "In modern society, gut thinking has a bad reputation."

Oh, really? Maybe it's true that at some point we all promised our parents that we'd be careful, rational, empirical decision makers, but beyond that, it's not easy to find evidence that ours is a society that frowns on gut thinking. Are the narratives of popular culture dominated by super-rational heroes triumphing over seat-of-the-pants gut-trusting bad guys? Actually, it's just the opposite: From Captain Kirk to Indiana Jones to Rambo to Tony Soprano to the hero of every Western ever made, we're drawn to the character who follows a hunch and wins.

And it's just as true in the business world. Who idolizes the plodding studiers of spreadsheets? Nobody. The most widely celebrated heroes of capitalism are the Steve Jobs, Richard Branson, or Mark Cuban types--the ones who scorn what the focus groups and the gurus say and follow their superior instincts into the highest possible tax bracket. Even corporate honchos whose success has had much to do with number crunching know that the rest of us look up to those who defy the odds, not those who play them. Did Jack Welch call his first book Notes Regarding Efficiency Gains Related to Six Sigma? No. He called it Jack: Straight From the Gut.

Or consider a pop-culture narrative that is partly about business. The heroine of William Gibson's best-selling 2003 novel, Pattern Recognition, is one of the most gut-driven characters ever: Cayce Pollard, a professional cool hunter, hired by corporations because her almost-supernatural instincts for whether, say, a certain logo would catch on in the marketplace trump all data and research. All she has to do is look at it, and she knows.

Amusingly, Pollard has basically become the model for scores of real-life trend spotters who present themselves as golden-gut types--and who seem to have no trouble finding corporate clients who haven't gotten the memo about gut thinking's "bad reputation."

Most of us, then, are quite open to hearing that we should trust our hunches. That's what we do most of the time, anyway. And that's precisely why trust-your-gut arguments are so popular--they're telling us exactly what we want to hear. Exhibit A: Blink, Gladwell's entertaining 2005 best-seller, which draws in part on Gigerenzer's research. Blink is actually pretty careful in its treatment of when gut instincts help us and when they fail us, but it's the bit about trusting your instincts that caught many readers' attention.

After all, like Gigerenzer's book, Blink's arguments were backed by hard data. Now there's the ultimate payoff: rational proof that we can stop worrying about rational proof.

But you're not really surprised to hear that, are you? I bet you knew it all along. I bet you could feel it. In your gut.

Source: FastCompany

Comments [0]

Linkedin is fastest-growing social network, Blogger top blog service

AMONG TOP SOCIAL NETWORKS, LINKED-IN was the fastest-growing over the last year, according to October ratings released Wednesday by Nielsen Online.

The site geared toward professional users drew 4.9 million visitors last month, up from 1.7 million a year ago.

Other fast-growing social networks included kiddie site Club Penguin, up 157% to 3.8 million users, and Facebook, more than doubling its audience to 19.5 million in the last year. MySpace remained the top social network with 58.8 million users, up 19% from 2006.

Blogger was the top blog-hosting service in October with 34 million users, followed by WordPress.com (11.4 million) and Six Apart (10.6 million.

Source: Mediapost

Comments [0]

Agencies to lose in digital revolution

Changing consumer habits, driven by the shift from analog to digital media, are revolutionizing the ad industry. But that could spell bad news for agencies, according to a new study by Accenture.

According to 70 industry leaders surveyed by Accenture, agencies have the most to lose in the new order, even more than broadcasters. When asked who would fare worst in the transition to digital advertising, 43 percent said agencies, compared to 33 percent who answered broadcasters. Cable operators were third with 10 percent. No respondents chose search companies or digital ad specialists.

The challenge agencies face stems from the rise of performance-based advertising and the technology tools needed to execute highly targeted campaigns, rather than mass-media pushes fueled by a singular "big idea," according to Charlie Symmons, senior manager in Accenture's media and entertainment practice.

"It used to be content was king; now it's very much context is king," he said.

For that reason, Accenture sees a threat to agencies from technology companies, which can provide the tools that allow clients to better know their customers. This could displace agencies' value to their clients, the report warns.

Accenture interviewed 70 advertising "decision makers" around the world from February through April this year. Respondents included executives from agencies, media companies and technology providers.

The consulting firm found 50 percent of respondents believe digital media would be the primary form of content and advertising delivery in the next five years. Over 80 percent think it will happen within a decade.

With that shift to digital, the survey found that advertising is undergoing a fundamental shift to become more accountable, Nearly four-fifths of respondents expect advertising will become more performance based, while 87 percent believe analytics will play a critical role.

Yet traditional advertisers are pessimistic they have a good grasp of the tools needed to operate in this landscape. Over 70 percent said the industry is not "technologically prepared for the resulting changes in performance measurement."

"People felt the complexity had grown over the last few years," Symmons said. "It's harder to target and track and develop campaigns."

While ad agencies were not expected to gain from these shifts, 46 percent thought search companies and 19 percent said digital ad specialists had the most to gain.

Source: Adweek

Comments [0]